Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755420Ab2FTHwY (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jun 2012 03:52:24 -0400 Received: from 173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.166.109.252]:44177 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755013Ab2FTHwX (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jun 2012 03:52:23 -0400 Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 03:52:16 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Jan Engelhardt Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, hch@infradead.org, joe@perches.com, bpm@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] types.h: implement intptr_t and uintptr_t Message-ID: <20120620075216.GA24798@infradead.org> References: <1338487534-14575-1-git-send-email-jengelh@inai.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1338487534-14575-1-git-send-email-jengelh@inai.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 542 Lines: 12 I'd really like to get Jans type cleanups in XFS in for the next merge window. Given the lack of feedback on lkml in favor or against (u)intptr_t I'm tempted to add them to xfs_linux.h for now, and then do another push to propagate them to kernel-wide types later. Is that fine with everybody? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/