Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755680Ab2FTIqR (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jun 2012 04:46:17 -0400 Received: from service87.mimecast.com ([91.220.42.44]:50272 "EHLO service87.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755452Ab2FTIp4 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jun 2012 04:45:56 -0400 Message-ID: <4FE18DBF.1070306@arm.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:45:51 +0100 From: viresh kumar User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Miller CC: "bhupesh.sharma@st.com" , "sfr@canb.auug.org.au" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "federico.vaga@gmail.com" , "giancarlo.asnaghi@st.com" , "wg@grandegger.com" , "mkl@pengutronix.de" , "spear-devel@list.st.com" Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree References: <20120620133348.a9ff31a72ffd11818f574fe3@canb.auug.org.au> <4FE18502.6040409@arm.com> <20120620.012037.783895812206310043.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20120620.012037.783895812206310043.davem@davemloft.net> X-MC-Unique: 112062009455401801 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1391 Lines: 35 On 20/06/12 09:20, David Miller wrote: > From: viresh kumar > Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:08:34 +0100 > >> > Please see following patchset from me, that got applied in linux-next >> > >> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/24/154 >> > >> > Please check if this patchset is present in your build repo. I believe it should be >> > there. If it is, then you shouldn't get these errors. > Well, then Stephen shouldn't get those errors either. > > But obviously he did. Surprised. I am not able to get why this happen. Because we don't have HAVE_CLK defined for x86_64, then the inline routines like following should come into play: static inline unsigned long clk_get_rate(struct clk *clk) { return 0; } Is there any tricky part for such routines with drivers compiled as modules? -- Viresh -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/