Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758177Ab2FTVvU (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jun 2012 17:51:20 -0400 Received: from swampdragon.chaosbits.net ([90.184.90.115]:18415 "EHLO swampdragon.chaosbits.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754859Ab2FTVvT (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jun 2012 17:51:19 -0400 Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 23:51:17 +0200 (CEST) From: Jesper Juhl To: Andrew Morton cc: Joe Perches , Alexandre Pereira da Silva , Florian Mickler , Ian Campbell , Richard Weinberger , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts/get_maintainer.pl: Add tested-by signature In-Reply-To: <20120620143959.394b9930.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Message-ID: References: <1340193105-10734-1-git-send-email-aletes.xgr@gmail.com> <1340209526.29885.14.camel@joe2Laptop> <20120620143959.394b9930.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LNX 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2489 Lines: 65 On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:25:26 -0700 > Joe Perches wrote: > > > On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 08:51 -0300, Alexandre Pereira da Silva wrote: > > > The tester of the patch should also be listed to receive patch > > > notifications. > > [] > > > diff --git a/scripts/get_maintainer.pl b/scripts/get_maintainer.pl > > [] > > > @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ my $penguin_chiefs = "\(" . join("|", @penguin_chief_names) . "\)"; > > > my @signature_tags = (); > > > push(@signature_tags, "Signed-off-by:"); > > > push(@signature_tags, "Reviewed-by:"); > > > +push(@signature_tags, "Tested-by:"); > > > push(@signature_tags, "Acked-by:"); > > > > I have no objections to this, but maybe Florian Mickler > > (cc'd) who did analysis on signatures awhile ago might. > > > > Yes. In my experience, a lot of tested-by's come from random internet > victims who happened to report a bug and who we'll never hear from > again and who don't want to be told other things about > whatever-part-of-the-kernel-that-was. > > Perhaps the set "has a tested-by, doesn't have reported-by" would > filter out a lot of these, dunno. It all sounds a bit marginal. > > > > Also, lots of people have used a "Reported-and-tested-by" and there are > even a few lysdexic "Tested-and-[rR]eported-by" tags in there. > > Any time I see one of these things I stomp on it and turn it into > separate reported-by and tested-by lines, as Reported-and-tested-by > just adds pointless duplication, work and noise. But I appear to have > lost that fight. > > > This fashion of adding new and innovative changelog tags just creates > inaccuracy and work for people who wish to mine that data for something > useful, as Alexandre is finding out. > > > > Geeze, guys. Who knew there were so many Kernel Komedians? > Andrew - stomp harder! I'm well aware that it's not your job to fix this mess - just couldn't help myself commenting on your "Any time I see one of these things I stomp on it" comment... You should stomp, and stomp HARD! -- Jesper Juhl http://www.chaosbits.net/ Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/