Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757227Ab2FUGhQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jun 2012 02:37:16 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:21904 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754373Ab2FUGhN (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jun 2012 02:37:13 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="183066483" Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/12] libata: bind the Linux device tree to the ACPI device tree From: Lin Ming To: Dan Williams Cc: Jeff Garzik , Aaron Lu , Holger Macht , Matthew Garrett , Alan Cox , David Woodhouse , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: <1340000766-129148-1-git-send-email-ming.m.lin@intel.com> <1340000766-129148-3-git-send-email-ming.m.lin@intel.com> <1340242002.20081.84.camel@minggr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:37:06 +0800 Message-ID: <1340260626.24067.4.camel@minggr> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 8695 Lines: 260 On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 20:59 -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Lin Ming wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 16:50 -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Lin Ming wrote: > >> > From: Matthew Garrett > >> > > >> > Associate the ACPI device tree and libata devices. > >> > This patch uses the generic ACPI glue framework to do so. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett > >> > Signed-off-by: Holger Macht > >> > Signed-off-by: Lin Ming > >> > --- > >> > > >> > Changelog: > >> > > >> > - fixed crash reported at https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/24/2 (Aaron Lu) > >> > - rename is_pci_ata to compat_pci_ata (Alan Cox) > >> > > >> > drivers/acpi/glue.c | 4 +- > >> > drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c | 125 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> > drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 3 ++ > >> > drivers/ata/libata.h | 4 ++ > >> > 4 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >> > > >> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/glue.c b/drivers/acpi/glue.c > >> > index 1564e09..18d6812 100644 > >> > --- a/drivers/acpi/glue.c > >> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/glue.c > >> [..] > >> > +static int ata_acpi_bind_host(struct device *dev, int host, acpi_handle *handle) > >> > +{ > >> > + struct Scsi_Host *shost = dev_to_shost(dev); > >> > + struct ata_port *ap = ata_shost_to_port(shost); > >> > + > >> > + if (ap->flags & ATA_FLAG_ACPI_SATA) > >> > + return -ENODEV; > >> > + > >> > + *handle = acpi_get_child(DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE(dev->parent), ap->port_no); > >> > + > >> > + if (!*handle) > >> > + return -ENODEV; > >> > + > >> > + return 0; > >> > +} > >> > >> I think this patch should be squashed with patch 4, right? That is if > >> we keep the hard-coded ->parent chasing... > > > > Right. Will merge patch 4. > > > >> > >> > +static int ata_acpi_find_device(struct device *dev, acpi_handle *handle) > >> > +{ > >> > + unsigned int host, channel, id, lun; > >> > + > >> > + if (sscanf(dev_name(dev), "host%u", &host) == 1) { > >> > + if (!compat_pci_ata(dev->parent)) > >> > + return -ENODEV; > >> > + > >> > + return ata_acpi_bind_host(dev, host, handle); > >> > + } else if (sscanf(dev_name(dev), "%d:%d:%d:%d", > >> > + &host, &channel, &id, &lun) == 4) { > >> > + if (!compat_pci_ata(dev->parent->parent->parent)) > >> > + return -ENODEV; > >> > >> ...this looks like it should be using a dev_to_ata_port() helper which > >> like dev_to_shost() skips the need to remember just how many parents > >> until we get back to our ata_port, scsi_host, etc. > > > > Oh, no. > > > > compat_pci_ata checks whether the controller(rather than shost or ata > > port) is pci SATA/IDE controller. > > > > As in patch 4: > > compat_pci_ata(dev->parent->parent->parent->parent) > > > > The "dev" is ata port, and dev->parent->parent->parent->parent points to > > the controller dev. > > > > This looks ugly. How about add two helpers? > > shost_to_controller(dev) and ata_port_to_controller(dev) > > > > What about something like the following (untested)? Makes it mostly > independent of the topology, gives some type safety, and drops some > redundant work finding the ata_port. > > static int ata_acpi_find_device(struct device *dev, acpi_handle *handle) > { > struct ata_port *ap = dev_to_ata_port(dev); > > if (!ap) > return -ENODEV; > > if (!compat_pci_ata(ap)) > return -ENODEV; > > if (scsi_is_host_device(dev)) > return ata_acpi_bind_host(ap, handle); > else if (scsi_is_sdev_device(dev)) { > struct scsi_device *sdev = to_scsi_device(dev); > > return ata_acpi_bind_device(ap, sdev->channel, > sdev->id, handle); > } else > return -ENODEV; > } Good idea. Below is the incremental patch on top of this series. drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 2 -- drivers/ata/libata.h | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c index 08edebf..4112eaa 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c @@ -1075,8 +1075,9 @@ void ata_acpi_unbind(struct ata_device *dev) ata_acpi_unregister_power_resource(dev); } -static int compat_pci_ata(struct device *dev) +static int compat_pci_ata(struct ata_port *ap) { + struct device *dev = ap->tdev.parent; struct pci_dev *pdev; if (!is_pci_dev(dev)) @@ -1091,15 +1092,13 @@ static int compat_pci_ata(struct device *dev) return 1; } -static int ata_acpi_bind_host(struct device *dev, int host, acpi_handle *handle) +static int ata_acpi_bind_host(struct ata_port *ap, acpi_handle *handle) { - struct Scsi_Host *shost = dev_to_shost(dev); - struct ata_port *ap = ata_shost_to_port(shost); - if (ap->flags & ATA_FLAG_ACPI_SATA) return -ENODEV; - *handle = acpi_get_child(DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE(dev->parent->parent), ap->port_no); + *handle = acpi_get_child(DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE(ap->tdev.parent), + ap->port_no); if (!*handle) return -ENODEV; @@ -1107,21 +1106,18 @@ static int ata_acpi_bind_host(struct device *dev, int host, acpi_handle *handle) return 0; } -static int ata_acpi_bind_device(struct device *dev, int channel, int id, +static int ata_acpi_bind_device(struct ata_port *ap, struct scsi_device *sdev, acpi_handle *handle) { - struct scsi_device *sdev = to_scsi_device(dev); - struct Scsi_Host *shost = sdev->host; - struct ata_port *ap = ata_shost_to_port(shost); struct ata_device *ata_dev; acpi_status status; struct acpi_device *acpi_dev; struct acpi_device_power_state *states; if (ap->flags & ATA_FLAG_ACPI_SATA) - ata_dev = &ap->link.device[channel]; + ata_dev = &ap->link.device[sdev->channel]; else - ata_dev = &ap->link.device[id]; + ata_dev = &ap->link.device[sdev->id]; *handle = ata_dev_acpi_handle(ata_dev); @@ -1146,21 +1142,37 @@ static int ata_acpi_bind_device(struct device *dev, int channel, int id, return 0; } +static int is_ata_port(const struct device *dev) +{ + return dev->type == &ata_port_type; +} + +static struct ata_port *dev_to_ata_port(struct device *dev) +{ + while (!is_ata_port(dev)) { + if (!dev->parent) + return NULL; + dev = dev->parent; + } + return to_ata_port(dev); +} + static int ata_acpi_find_device(struct device *dev, acpi_handle *handle) { - unsigned int host, channel, id, lun; + struct ata_port *ap = dev_to_ata_port(dev); - if (sscanf(dev_name(dev), "host%u", &host) == 1) { - if (!compat_pci_ata(dev->parent->parent)) - return -ENODEV; + if (!ap) + return -ENODEV; + + if (!compat_pci_ata(ap)) + return -ENODEV; - return ata_acpi_bind_host(dev, host, handle); - } else if (sscanf(dev_name(dev), "%d:%d:%d:%d", - &host, &channel, &id, &lun) == 4) { - if (!compat_pci_ata(dev->parent->parent->parent->parent)) - return -ENODEV; + if (scsi_is_host_device(dev)) + return ata_acpi_bind_host(ap, handle); + else if (scsi_is_sdev_device(dev)) { + struct scsi_device *sdev = to_scsi_device(dev); - return ata_acpi_bind_device(dev, channel, id, handle); + return ata_acpi_bind_device(ap, sdev, handle); } else return -ENODEV; } diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c index ba169c4..c14f88c 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c @@ -5291,8 +5291,6 @@ static int ata_port_request_pm(struct ata_port *ap, pm_message_t mesg, return rc; } -#define to_ata_port(d) container_of(d, struct ata_port, tdev) - static int ata_port_suspend_common(struct device *dev, pm_message_t mesg) { struct ata_port *ap = to_ata_port(dev); diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata.h b/drivers/ata/libata.h index b0ba924..44a7939 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/libata.h +++ b/drivers/ata/libata.h @@ -107,6 +107,8 @@ extern const char *sata_spd_string(unsigned int spd); extern int ata_port_probe(struct ata_port *ap); extern void __ata_port_probe(struct ata_port *ap); +#define to_ata_port(d) container_of(d, struct ata_port, tdev) + /* libata-acpi.c */ #ifdef CONFIG_ATA_ACPI extern unsigned int ata_acpi_gtf_filter; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/