Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 15:18:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 15:18:44 -0400 Received: from pc2-cwma1-5-cust12.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.121.12]:6649 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 15:18:42 -0400 Subject: Re: A question about cache coherence From: Alan Cox To: Xuehua Chen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020819182121.93059.qmail@web13008.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20020819182121.93059.qmail@web13008.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-6) Date: 19 Aug 2002 20:23:03 +0100 Message-Id: <1029784983.19758.50.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 660 Lines: 22 On Mon, 2002-08-19 at 19:21, Xuehua Chen wrote: > 1. Do Xeon processors have hardware mechanisms to > maintain cache coherence? Yes > 2. Does the SMP kernel handle the cache coherence > problem The kernel has to manage side issues (TLB shootdown etc) > 3. What should I do if both of them don't handle cache > coherence. Debug your code. It is possible you are hitting a kernel bug but its extremely unlikely. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/