Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759102Ab2FUPCu (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:02:50 -0400 Received: from nat28.tlf.novell.com ([130.57.49.28]:58978 "EHLO nat28.tlf.novell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758844Ab2FUPCt convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:02:49 -0400 Message-Id: <4FE353E0020000780008B263@nat28.tlf.novell.com> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 12.0.0 Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:03:28 +0100 From: "Jan Beulich" To: "Bjorn Helgaas" , "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: , , "Ingo Molnar" , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/PCI: adjust section annotations References: <4FDF2044020000780008A66F@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <4FE3040B020000780008B030@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <4FE32E87.1020809@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: <4FE32E87.1020809@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 803 Lines: 22 >>> On 21.06.12 at 16:24, "H. Peter Anvin" wrote: > On 06/21/2012 07:19 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> >> OK. Ingo, do you want to take this after all? >> >> If I push stuff through my PCI tree, I try really hard to make PCI >> overall more consistent, not less consistent, so I'm not very >> interested in taking minor improvements to just one arch. >> > > I can take this, but the above sounds very close to a NAK to me... If that one hunk is causing so much grief, how about I resend the whole patch with that one change dropped? Jan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/