Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 15:49:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 15:49:41 -0400 Received: from mx1.elte.hu ([157.181.1.137]:36548 "HELO mx1.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 15:49:40 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 21:55:02 +0200 (CEST) From: Ingo Molnar Reply-To: Ingo Molnar To: Linus Torvalds Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: MAX_PID changes in 2.5.31 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1237 Lines: 31 Linus, afaics, you did the PID_MAX changes in v2.5.31? This is a change i had for (surprise) threading purposes already, but done a bit differently. The main problem is that there's the old-style SysV IPC interface that uses 16-bit PIDs still. All recent SysV applications (linked against glibc 2.2 or newer) use IPC_64, but any application linked against pre-2.2 glibcs will fail. glibc 2.2 was released 2 years ago, is this enough of a timeout to obsolete the non-IPC_64 interfaces? if that is the case then can i rip all the non-IPC_64 parts out of ipc/*, and let non-IPC_64 calls fail? Right now it's silent breakage that happens. or, in my threading tree, i introduced a /proc/sys/kernel/pid_max tunable, which has the safe conservative value of 32K PIDs, but which can be changed by the admin to have higher PIDs. [anything more complex than this i think should be ignored - we do not want to complicate PID allocations just for the sake of a single old 16-bit interface.] Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/