Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 17:38:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 17:38:27 -0400 Received: from pixpat.austin.ibm.com ([192.35.232.241]:44381 "EHLO baldur.austin.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 17:38:26 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 16:42:22 -0500 From: Dave McCracken To: Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] O(1) sys_exit(), threading, scalable-exit-2.5.31-A6 Message-ID: <100750000.1029793342@baldur.austin.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.2.1 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 925 Lines: 23 --On Monday, August 19, 2002 02:29:08 PM -0700 Linus Torvalds wrote: > No, you only need to make debugged children slightly pecial in wait4(), in > that the parent must never see their state, only the fact that they are > there (as if they were still running, in short, regardless of their _real_ > state) So does that mean we need something like a 'count of children stolen by debuggers' in the task struct that wait4() can check? Dave ====================================================================== Dave McCracken IBM Linux Base Kernel Team 1-512-838-3059 dmccr@us.ibm.com T/L 678-3059 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/