Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 18:33:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 18:33:00 -0400 Received: from vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca ([136.159.55.21]:7325 "EHLO vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 18:32:59 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 16:36:59 -0600 Message-Id: <200208192236.g7JMaxS28968@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> From: Richard Gooch To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Linus Torvalds , Subject: Re: MAX_PID changes in 2.5.31 In-Reply-To: References: <200208192231.g7JMVQI28575@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 836 Lines: 25 Ingo Molnar writes: > > On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Richard Gooch wrote: > > > Are you saying that people running libc 5 or even glibc 2.1 will > > suddenly have their code broken? > > nope. Only if they use the 16-bit PID stuff in SysV IPC semaphores > and message queues. In other words, "yes, unless you happen not to use SysV IPC semaphores or message queues in any of your binaries on your system". So you want to break binary compatibility. Please don't. I don't want to downgrade to glibc. Regards, Richard.... Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/