Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S319102AbSHSXay>; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 19:30:54 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S319103AbSHSXay>; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 19:30:54 -0400
Received: from pD952A30B.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.82.163.11]:36483 "EHLO
	hawkeye.luckynet.adm") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S319102AbSHSXax>; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 19:30:53 -0400
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 17:34:51 -0600 (MDT)
From: Thunder from the hill <thunder@lightweight.ods.org>
X-X-Sender: thunder@hawkeye.luckynet.adm
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
cc: zdzichu@irc.pl, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.4 and full ipv6 - will it happen?
In-Reply-To: <20020818.213719.117777405.davem@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208191733540.3234-100000@hawkeye.luckynet.adm>
X-Location: Dorndorf; Germany
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 869
Lines: 24

Hi,

On Sun, 18 Aug 2002, David S. Miller wrote:
>    Linux still has superior networking, but protocol of the future is IPv6.
> 
> That is your opinion.  This is what people have been saying since some
> 6 or 7 years ago, and ipv6 has not moved much further out of
> experimental state since then.

We're using it for years now. Works well, made me incredibly happy ever
since. Just too cool thing.

			Thunder
-- 
--./../...-/. -.--/---/..-/.-./..././.-../..-. .---/..-/.../- .-
--/../-./..-/-/./--..-- ../.----./.-../.-.. --./../...-/. -.--/---/..-
.- -/---/--/---/.-./.-./---/.--/.-.-.-
--./.-/-.../.-./.././.-../.-.-.-

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/