Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S319111AbSHSXwW>; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 19:52:22 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S319112AbSHSXwV>; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 19:52:21 -0400
Received: from daytona.gci.com ([205.140.80.57]:17412 "EHLO daytona.gci.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S319111AbSHSXwV>;
	Mon, 19 Aug 2002 19:52:21 -0400
Message-ID: <BF9651D8732ED311A61D00105A9CA31509E4C1D2@berkeley.gci.com>
From: Leif Sawyer <lsawyer@gci.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: 2.4 and full ipv6 - will it happen?
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 15:56:12 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 776
Lines: 19

Daniel Berlin responded to:
> David S. Miller, who wrote:
> > 
> > There are zero backbone ipv6 routers, everyone is still tunneling
> > or has a custom network layout for their usage.
> 
> Errr, not quite:
> 
> From a presentation entitled "Commercial IPV6 at Worldcom"    

True, and we're starting to plan a migration to IPv6 on our statewide
network.  Lots of advantages to IPv6.  I'd love to have decent
support in the kernel -- i've tried various configurations and never
was able to keep anything stable, direct or tunneled.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/