Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 20:29:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 20:29:25 -0400 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:20495 "HELO garrincha.netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 20:29:24 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 21:32:11 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: "David S. Miller" cc: thunder@lightweight.ods.org, , Subject: Re: 2.4 and full ipv6 - will it happen? In-Reply-To: <20020819.162340.133733118.davem@redhat.com> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 823 Lines: 27 On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, David S. Miller wrote: > There are zero backbone ipv6 routers, everyone is still tunneling > or has a custom network layout for their usage. Actually, there are a few sites busy shutting down most of their tunnels since they've got good enough native ipv6 peering now. It's true that 90% of the internet doesn't have native ipv6 yet, but don't underestimate the rest of the net. It would be nice if Linux was better at ipv6 ;) regards, Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/