Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755832Ab2FYLjn (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jun 2012 07:39:43 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:51540 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751863Ab2FYLjm (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jun 2012 07:39:42 -0400 Subject: Re: Question about the export of symbol lockdep_init_map From: Peter Zijlstra To: Larry Finger Cc: Ingo Molnar , LKML In-Reply-To: <4FE7512D.2010608@lwfinger.net> References: <4FE7512D.2010608@lwfinger.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 13:39:28 +0200 Message-ID: <1340624368.2507.53.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1626 Lines: 38 On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 12:41 -0500, Larry Finger wrote: > Ingo, > > when you added the locking correctness validator code in commit fbb9ce95, you > exported lockdep_init_map() with EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL. This choice is causing a > problem with the latest version of Broadcom's hybrid wl driver. Although I do > not agree with their policies regarding drivers with binary blobs, there are > some devices such as the BCM43228 (14e4:4359) for which no open-source driver is > yet available. As a result, owners of such devices are forced to use solutions > such as ndiswrapper, which is worse than using wl. > > would you accept the following patch? > > Index: wireless-testing/kernel/lockdep.c > =================================================================== > --- wireless-testing.orig/kernel/lockdep.c > +++ wireless-testing/kernel/lockdep.c > @@ -2994,7 +2994,7 @@ void lockdep_init_map(struct lockdep_map > if (subclass) > register_lock_class(lock, subclass, 1); > } > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lockdep_init_map); > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(lockdep_init_map); > > struct lock_class_key __lockdep_no_validate__; > I can't speak for Ingo, but I would object to it. Owners of such devices can send them back to wherever they got them from and demand a refund. Loading binary blobs pretty much wrecks your kernel validation anyway, who knows what they do. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/