Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755938Ab2F1RVa (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:21:30 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47295 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752375Ab2F1RV2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:21:28 -0400 Message-ID: <1340904084.3179.41.camel@ul30vt> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4][RFC] kvm: eoi_eventfd From: Alex Williamson To: Avi Kivity Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jan.kiszka@siemens.com, mst@redhat.com Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 11:21:24 -0600 In-Reply-To: <4FEC860B.3090605@redhat.com> References: <20120622220040.9858.43665.stgit@bling.home> <20120622221626.9858.33817.stgit@bling.home> <4FE70E99.90609@redhat.com> <1340550156.14120.53.camel@bling.home> <4FEC860B.3090605@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2100 Lines: 46 On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 19:27 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 06/24/2012 06:02 PM, Alex Williamson wrote: > > On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 15:56 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > >> On 06/23/2012 01:16 AM, Alex Williamson wrote: > >> > I think we're probably also going to need something like this. > >> > When running in non-accelerated qemu, we're going to have to > >> > create some kind of EOI notifier for drivers. VFIO can make > >> > additional improvements when running on KVM so it will probably > >> > make use of the KVM_IRQFD_LEVEL_EOI interface, but we don't > >> > want to have a generic EOI notifier in qemu that just stops > >> > working when kvm-ioapic is enabled. > >> > >> Why? > > > > Hmm, I must be missing something or not describing it correctly, because > > it seems obvious. > > I have not exhausted this quarter's quota of stupid questions yet. ;) > > If we create a dependency in qemu of needing to know > > when an eoi occurs and notifier a driver and have no way to fulfill that > > dependency when running on kvm... that'd be bad, right? I don't want to > > assume that every consumer of such an interface would prefer to make use > > of an irqfd. Not sure if that answers your question though. Thanks, > > I meant, what scenario do you have in mind where we want the EOI > notifier while running with kvm-irqchip enabled? Perhaps I phrased my > question a bit too tersely. Aha. Well, the v2 series really pulls eoifd in as more of a primary player and is now the only way to get EOI notification regardless of whether it's bound to a separate level irq source or used by qemu for the common userspace source. I don't know of any users that currently need EOI notification for the common userspace source id, but depending on where we land with whether KVM_IRQFD supports level interrupts, it may be vfio that needs it. Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/