Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753435Ab2HANAO (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Aug 2012 09:00:14 -0400 Received: from smtp.ctxuk.citrix.com ([62.200.22.115]:18300 "EHLO SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751538Ab2HANAM (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Aug 2012 09:00:12 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,694,1336348800"; d="scan'208";a="13802856" Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 13:59:53 +0100 From: Stefano Stabellini X-X-Sender: sstabellini@kaball.uk.xensource.com To: Nikunj A Dadhania CC: Stefano Stabellini , Stefano Stabellini , Peter Zijlstra , "mingo@elte.hu" , "mtosatti@redhat.com" , "avi@redhat.com" , "raghukt@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "x86@kernel.org" , "jeremy@goop.org" , "vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , "hpa@zytor.com" , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] kvm,x86: RCU based table free In-Reply-To: <87txwmlskp.fsf@abhimanyu.in.ibm.com> Message-ID: References: <20120604050223.4560.2874.stgit@abhimanyu.in.ibm.com> <20120604050822.4560.54662.stgit@abhimanyu.in.ibm.com> <87ehpuqam8.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <878vg1rjts.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1338901688.28282.168.camel@twins> <87txwmlskp.fsf@abhimanyu.in.ibm.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1694 Lines: 47 On Wed, 1 Aug 2012, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > On Wed, 1 Aug 2012 12:23:37 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 18:34 +0530, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote: > > > > > PeterZ, is 7/7 alright to be picked? > > > > > > > > Yeah, I guess it is.. I haven't had time to rework my tlb series yet > > > > though. But these two patches together should make it work for x86. > > > > > > > > > > Good. Do you think they are OK for 3.5-rc2? Or is it better to wait for > > > 3.6? > > > > > > > Hello Nikunj, > > what happened to this patch series? > > In particular I am interested in the following two patches: > > > > kvm,x86: RCU based table free > > Flush page-table pages before freeing them > > > > do you still intend to carry on with the development? Is there anything > > missing that is preventing them from going upstream? > > > I have posted a v3 on the kvm-list: > http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg76955.html > > I am carrying the above two patches(with one fix) in my series as well > for completeness. > > I have picked up the patches from PeterZ's "Unify TLB gather > implementations -v3" > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mm/81278 It is good to see that you are following up on this; since I didn't see any updates I got worried :) Cheers, Stefano -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/