Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 17:27:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 17:27:14 -0400 Received: from quechua.inka.de ([212.227.14.2]:36464 "EHLO mail.inka.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 17:27:13 -0400 From: Bernd Eckenfels To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4 and full ipv6 - will it happen? In-Reply-To: X-Newsgroups: ka.lists.linux.kernel User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (Linux/2.0.39 (i686)) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 23:31:21 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1272 Lines: 28 In article you wrote: > it. There are people who want to see it mainstreamed. Face it, IPv4 is > inadequate for today's needs. What happens when the entire IPv4 addressing > space is exhausted? Move to NAT? I don't think so. Well, I think the worlds oil ressources will be exhausted before the IPv4 Space is exhausted. There are a lot of possible ways. > requirement. NAT destroys that, and therefore makes those applications > either unusable, or difficult to use without special configurations. well.. another option is, to write sane applications. > No, IPv6 may not be mainstream yet, but there *are* people who want to use > it. Just because you don't, doesn't mean that nobody else should. I, for > one, will welcome IPv6's adoption with open arms. i am using it on my personal family lan and to connect to irc servers, but I dont see it becoming mainstream this decade. Hell, even there is no accepted DNS standard, yet. Greetings Bernd - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/