Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754831Ab2HBOH5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Aug 2012 10:07:57 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:44975 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753500Ab2HBOH4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Aug 2012 10:07:56 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="201431705" Message-ID: <1343916747.25013.112.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Subject: Re: UBI fastmap updates From: Artem Bityutskiy Reply-To: artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com To: Richard Weinberger Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com, Heinz.Egger@linutronix.de, thomas.wucher@linutronix.de, shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, tim.bird@am.sony.com, Marius.Mazarel@ugal.ro, nyoushchenko@mvista.com Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 17:12:27 +0300 In-Reply-To: <1341836323-43916-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> References: <1341836323-43916-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-BdUaR9c9eJlI6Q8EUu6K" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3 (3.2.3-3.fc16) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2111 Lines: 56 --=-BdUaR9c9eJlI6Q8EUu6K Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 14:18 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > This is the next round of UBI fastmap updates. > It fixes all issues pointed out by Shmulik. :-) I see the following errors when rung UBI tests on nandsim: [ 3698.041511] UBI error: __wl_get_peb: no free eraseblocks [ 3698.041781] UBI error: ubi_wl_get_fm_peb: no free eraseblocks [ 3714.773064] UBI error: __wl_get_peb: no free eraseblocks [ 3714.773336] UBI error: ubi_wl_get_fm_peb: no free eraseblocks How can this happen? I do not have any bad blocks. If I understand correctly, it can be only because of a bug. If I am correct, could you please add a 'dump_stack()' to improve the error report? --=20 Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy --=-BdUaR9c9eJlI6Q8EUu6K Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJQGorLAAoJECmIfjd9wqK0OGYQAIi3uQ/7A7BKAXb6ZpWVfdDu V728o5vakOWhu5sC69QmawokMTQ1j1EnhEhNoSFliB3RsCOU4DnAUNkQ2vACdxCo j6DAwc1v4uh4YqOW5f0Y25db9V78u7Hv4mauKieuQbSt2vFJwLYn8q4kzmvnyak4 pUR0CCt9gKFuMeW2sfe3pDFIEWl+C3Adfyu8IX9YMlShh1BbgKNKXRJO3LqlVaiW evf+YXbFHkP5A5V4+m4yn1oaB6QIEkXWCxdHlhiy1G02OncVdjv97Yw84X8SgEJV Hgto4DxtTzkNKuOal9x6NBC4Qe7hbyDD7RAkcBkD6NWV/tzY+uxe7K/cxvDglxzZ zhvdBcXASqSlqXt3Flrga1oPu/jhQBVNYXGRIDu8K37yXryl2gi12RlsXVeG1HO0 BUNV5r5LS6j4Sr7nObTDMA+CIp+bvFXnGtv1w2oyaprOuIS9AeHWKNDqtwZUOx8B yP7zQ+pq3EyNsLHXKyR71ktZo29cKM7tAoJkUL2Hav3NkokTelnD1sDOzyWE6hZY wCDhdpVa/ajo11kUdd8ddF2sJ1kP7QMfWKHnG/Nb3ABoZqxViS3CyPAtiOrWUUlz 1jhHJeCOkhOice+Izocxn8BSdx9Hg1IiZXv7hvjzt2/mlPm31UWzlE+Kvqk3foiA TtbPevzzPzSPbACArA7T =Yupu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-BdUaR9c9eJlI6Q8EUu6K-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/