Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 02:09:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 02:09:29 -0400 Received: from pD9E233F0.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.226.51.240]:15249 "EHLO hawkeye.luckynet.adm") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 02:09:29 -0400 Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 00:12:56 -0600 (MDT) From: Thunder from the hill X-X-Sender: thunder@hawkeye.luckynet.adm To: Alan Cox cc: Bernd Eckenfels , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: 2.4 and full ipv6 - will it happen? In-Reply-To: <1029967688.26845.242.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: X-Location: Dorndorf; Germany MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 928 Lines: 24 Hi, On 21 Aug 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > So IPv6 neither helps nor hinders Well, it's not too easy any more to say "I am the Alan Cox client. Send me naked children." If you were ever hit by that or similar, you'd certainly think differently, once you've seen that these "tools" for IPv4 are mainstream, while the tools for IPv6 are rather rare, and the fake packets got discarded anyway. If they're unlikely to be discarded -- I can't agree. They just were. Thunder -- --./../...-/. -.--/---/..-/.-./..././.-../..-. .---/..-/.../- .- --/../-./..-/-/./--..-- ../.----./.-../.-.. --./../...-/. -.--/---/..- .- -/---/--/---/.-./.-./---/.--/.-.-.- --./.-/-.../.-./.././.-../.-.-.- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/