Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 08:24:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 08:24:08 -0400 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:14098 "HELO garrincha.netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 08:24:07 -0400 Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 09:27:36 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Thunder from the hill cc: Alan Cox , Bernd Eckenfels , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: 2.4 and full ipv6 - will it happen? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1111 Lines: 29 On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, Thunder from the hill wrote: > On 21 Aug 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > > So IPv6 neither helps nor hinders > > Well, it's not too easy any more to say "I am the Alan Cox client. Send me > naked children." If you were ever hit by that or similar, you'd certainly > think differently, once you've seen that these "tools" for IPv4 are > mainstream, while the tools for IPv6 are rather rare, and the fake packets > got discarded anyway. If they're unlikely to be discarded -- I can't > agree. They just were. Filtering is a question of proper ingress/egress setup by the ISPs. This is fairly common in the ipv4 world, but not yet common enough. The ipv6 world hasn't yet started _route filtering_, let alone ingress/egress filtering ;) Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/