Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 12:42:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 12:42:05 -0400 Received: from louise.pinerecords.com ([212.71.160.16]:31759 "EHLO louise.pinerecords.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 12:42:04 -0400 Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 18:45:27 +0200 From: Tomas Szepe To: Martin Wilck Cc: Andre Hedrick , Gonzalo Servat , Alan Cox , Linux Kernel mailing list Subject: Re: ServerWorks OSB4 in impossible state Message-ID: <20020822164527.GA11488@louise.pinerecords.com> References: <1030017756.9866.74.camel@biker.pdb.fsc.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1030017756.9866.74.camel@biker.pdb.fsc.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-OS: GNU/Linux 2.4.19-pre10/sparc SMP X-Uptime: 79 days, 8:27 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 821 Lines: 18 > > Yeah I expect to take heat for this one from ServerWorks and it may cost > > me later, but nobody else has got the guts to press the issue for the > > correct solution. > > Let me know if we can help. I have no personal contacts to ServerWorks, > but we are a large customer of them and may be able to exert some > additional pressure. The current situation (IDE DMA must be disabled) > is hardly acceptable for us anyway. AFAIK 2.4.18 as well as 2.4.19-preEARLY seemed to work flawlessly w/ OSB4 even in DMA modes. How's the code there then? Is it dangerous to use? T. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/