Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 14:17:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 14:17:29 -0400 Received: from pc2-cwma1-5-cust12.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.121.12]:61427 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 14:17:28 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.4 and full ipv6 - will it happen? From: Alan Cox To: Thunder from the hill Cc: Bernd Eckenfels , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-6) Date: 22 Aug 2002 19:22:41 +0100 Message-Id: <1030040562.3090.47.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 942 Lines: 21 On Thu, 2002-08-22 at 07:12, Thunder from the hill wrote: > Well, it's not too easy any more to say "I am the Alan Cox client. Send me > naked children." If you were ever hit by that or similar, you'd certainly > think differently, once you've seen that these "tools" for IPv4 are Its trivial. IPv4 or IPv6 it takes a couple of minutes of fiddling from a suitably connected point. I wouldnt actually bother with that anyway, the people who maintain web cache logs are normally paid so little that $1000 for running a provided script really would be less hassle for your budding organised criminal or government agent. There is no difference in the security between IPv4 and IPv6. None at all. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/