Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 14:22:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 14:22:39 -0400 Received: from quechua.inka.de ([212.227.14.2]:33552 "EHLO mail.inka.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 14:22:38 -0400 From: Bernd Eckenfels To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4 and full ipv6 - will it happen? In-Reply-To: X-Newsgroups: ka.lists.linux.kernel User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (Linux/2.0.39 (i686)) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 20:26:49 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 860 Lines: 19 In article you wrote: > Well, it's not too easy any more to say "I am the Alan Cox client. Send me > naked children." If you were ever hit by that or similar, you'd certainly > think differently, once you've seen that these "tools" for IPv4 are > mainstream, while the tools for IPv6 are rather rare, do you mean ipspoofing tools for v4 are mainstream and for v6 are not, thats why v6 is more secure? v6 isnt more secure than v4, and i suspect ipsec is more widely used in v4 than in v6, and i doubt it will ever be used on default. Greetings Bernd - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/