Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755792Ab2HFJaC (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Aug 2012 05:30:02 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:51305 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755313Ab2HFJ37 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Aug 2012 05:29:59 -0400 Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 11:29:55 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: webmaster@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: ftpadmin@kernel.org Subject: Re: No 3.5 version on www.kernel.org Message-ID: <20120806092954.GB22183@liondog.tnic> Mail-Followup-To: Borislav Petkov , webmaster@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ftpadmin@kernel.org References: <20120806064856.GA24464@mac.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120806064856.GA24464@mac.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 696 Lines: 19 On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 08:48:56AM +0200, Tino Keitel wrote: > Hi, > > when looking at http://www.kernel.org/, kernel 3.4.7 is shown as the > latest stable kernel, and 3.6-rc1 as the latest mainline kernel. The > 3.5 version is not mentioned. Why is the latest stable kernel something > older than 3.5? Someone already asked this. Let's cc one more party (although webmaster@.. could be going to the same people :-)). -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/