Message-ID: <1344256306.14728.29.camel@cr0>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] netpoll: use GFP_ATOMIC in slave_enable_netpoll()
 and __netpoll_setup()
From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>, Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
        Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 20:31:46 +0800
In-Reply-To: <1344246244.26674.0.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
References: <1343403484-29347-1-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com>
	 <1343403484-29347-2-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com>
	 <1343985428.9299.868.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1343986487.20871.2.camel@cr0>
	 <1343988623.9299.932.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	 <1344244118.14728.28.camel@cr0> <1344246244.26674.0.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 860
Lines: 29

On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 11:44 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 17:08 +0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 12:10 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: 
> > > 
> > > I did this , just take it ;)
> > 
> > Do we have to pass gfp to ->ndo_netpoll_setup() too? It seems no, so far
> > I don't think we have to do that.
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> 
> It is needed.
> 
> ->ndo_netpoll_setup() is called from __netpoll_setup()
> 
> So it would make no sense to allow GFP_KERNEL allocations in
> ndo_netpoll_setup() hgandlers if we called __netpoll_setup() with
> GFP_ATOMIC gfp
> 

I see your point. Thanks!


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/