Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 19:08:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 19:08:24 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:30994 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 19:08:23 -0400 Message-ID: <3D656FDC.8040008@mandrakesoft.com> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 19:12:28 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik Organization: MandrakeSoft User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1b) Gecko/20020722 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Eric W. Biederman" CC: Andre Hedrick , "Heater, Daniel (IndSys, GEFanuc, VMIC)" , "'Padraig Brady'" , "'Linux Kernel'" Subject: Re: IDE-flash device and hard disk on same controller References: <3D62BC10.3060201@mandrakesoft.com> <3D62C2A3.4070701@mandrakesoft.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 782 Lines: 21 Eric W. Biederman wrote: > I don't see any checking for the ATA bsy flag before you start sending > commands. I have seen the current IDE code fail too many times if I > boot to fast, because of a lack of this one simple test. So I don't > see how this could be considered a proper probe. There is no ATA bsy flag check at only one point, and that is before EXECUTE DEVICE DIAGNOSTIC is issued. The idea with this command is that it pretty much stomps up and down the ATA bus, trouncing ongoing activity in the process. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/