Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757218Ab2HGCJB (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Aug 2012 22:09:01 -0400 Received: from ch1ehsobe001.messaging.microsoft.com ([216.32.181.181]:27862 "EHLO ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757057Ab2HGCJA (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Aug 2012 22:09:00 -0400 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:70.37.183.190;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPV:NLI;H:mail.freescale.net;RD:none;EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: 2 X-BigFish: VS2(z37d5kz98dIzz1202hzzz2dh87h2a8h668h839h944hd25he96hf0ah107ah) X-FB-DOMAIN-IP-MATCH: fail Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 10:09:09 +0800 From: Shawn Guo To: Matt Sealey CC: Robert Schwebel , Mark Brown , Anton Vorontsov , Russell King , John Stultz , , , , Sascha Hauer Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] ASoC: imx: Don't use {en,dis}able_fiq() calls Message-ID: <20120807020907.GB24289@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> References: <20120805230238.GA1663@lizard> <1344207819-3415-4-git-send-email-anton.vorontsov@linaro.org> <20120806154951.GQ16861@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120806193734.GA16199@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120806201609.GX25644@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-OriginatorOrg: sigmatel.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1093 Lines: 26 On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 03:39:50PM -0500, Matt Sealey wrote: > * make sure there's no weird FIQ stuff floating around that has so far > relied on SND_SOC_IMX_PCM_FIQ doing select FIQ before I make it not Acked on changing SND_IMX_SOC to SND_SOC_IMX_PCM_FIQ in arch/arm/plat-mxc/Makefile. > compile in for other boards (since otherwise no i.MX processor selects > FIQ if they're not using that driver, it could be simply coincidence > nobody noticed). I don't want to be the one submitting a patch I can't > test which mysteriously breaks every MX28 on the planet (since Rob, > Shawn, Sascha might be the ones swearing at me instead) > Though i.MX23 and i.MX28 are named in i.MX family, they are actually a different architecture from IMX/MXC. It's MXS, nothing to do with SSI. Folder sound/soc/mxs/ is the one for i.MX28. -- Regards, Shawn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/