Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 04:46:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 04:46:20 -0400 Received: from pluvier.ens-lyon.fr ([140.77.167.5]:748 "EHLO mailhost.ens-lyon.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 04:46:20 -0400 Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 10:50:22 +0200 From: Eric Lemoine To: Mala Anand Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, lse-tech-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: netperf3 results on 2.5.25 kernel Message-ID: <20020823085021.GF551@hookipa> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Warning: return path set from From: address Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 673 Lines: 15 > I did a comparison test on 2.4.17, 2.5.25 stock kernels and on 2.5.25 > with NAPI enabled e1000 driver using netperf3, tcp_stream 1 adapter > test using UNI kernels. The test setup/results can be found at: > http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/linuxperf/netperf/results/july_02/netperf2.5.25results.htm On which machine(s) do you actually test the kernels? Source machine? Destination machine? Or both? -- Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/