Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 11:14:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 11:14:20 -0400 Received: from chaos.physics.uiowa.edu ([128.255.34.189]:48095 "EHLO chaos.physics.uiowa.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 11:14:19 -0400 Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 10:18:23 -0500 (CDT) From: Kai Germaschewski X-X-Sender: kai@chaos.physics.uiowa.edu To: Greg Banks cc: Roman Zippel , Peter Samuelson , , Subject: Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: [patch] config language dep_* enhancements In-Reply-To: <3D60BA16.38B9CC40@alphalink.com.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1029 Lines: 26 On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Greg Banks wrote: > Roman Zippel wrote: > > > > The problem here is one should consider, how all these little changes will > > help to solve the big problems. Do they allow to more easily fix the big > > problems or have these changes to be dumped again? > > I believe fixing the existing rules within the existing syntax is an exercise > worth doing, and that the results will carry across to whatever extended syntax/ > new language/new parsers/whatever will be the long-term solution. Let me just second this. This doesn't mean to try random changes hoping that in the end the result is something sensible. But there are many cases which are obviously bugs or deficiences, and fixes / cleanups there are definitely a good idea as a first step. --Kai - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/