Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 18:59:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 18:59:50 -0400 Received: from smtpzilla1.xs4all.nl ([194.109.127.137]:22533 "EHLO smtpzilla1.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 18:59:50 -0400 Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 01:03:10 +0200 (CEST) From: Roman Zippel X-X-Sender: roman@serv To: Kai Germaschewski cc: Greg Banks , Peter Samuelson , , Subject: Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: [patch] config language dep_* enhancements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1048 Lines: 25 Hi, On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, Kai Germaschewski wrote: > > I believe fixing the existing rules within the existing syntax is an exercise > > worth doing, and that the results will carry across to whatever extended syntax/ > > new language/new parsers/whatever will be the long-term solution. > > Let me just second this. This doesn't mean to try random changes hoping > that in the end the result is something sensible. But there are many cases > which are obviously bugs or deficiences, and fixes / cleanups there are > definitely a good idea as a first step. Let me mention (again), that we are talking about two different problems here. On the hand bugs in the rulebase can be fixed with either syntax. On the other hand major cleanups/extensions are better done with only a single parser. bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/