Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 22:02:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 22:02:00 -0400 Received: from dsl-213-023-038-001.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.38.1]:39336 "EHLO starship") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 22:01:59 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Alan Cox , Marc-Christian Petersen Subject: Re: 2.4 kernel series and the oom_killer and /proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 04:07:43 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200208221719.50568.m.c.p@gmx.net> <1030037573.3090.3.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <1030037573.3090.3.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 597 Lines: 14 On Thursday 22 August 2002 19:32, Alan Cox wrote: > 3 is a totally paranoid [overcommit policy] that will require everything in > ram can be dumped to swap or paged back from backing store How do you handle the situation where you have a lot of shared memory in a half-paged-out state, so that each shared page consumes both ram and swap? -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/