Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 23:42:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 23:42:11 -0400 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:47626 "HELO garrincha.netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 23:42:10 -0400 Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 00:46:11 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Daniel Phillips cc: Alan Cox , Marc-Christian Petersen , Subject: Re: 2.4 kernel series and the oom_killer and /proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 915 Lines: 25 On Sat, 24 Aug 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote: > On Thursday 22 August 2002 19:32, Alan Cox wrote: > > 3 is a totally paranoid [overcommit policy] that will require everything in > > ram can be dumped to swap or paged back from backing store > > How do you handle the situation where you have a lot of shared memory in a > half-paged-out state, so that each shared page consumes both ram and swap? That will work fine with 'totally paranoid' mode. There is always enough swap space to hold _all_ pages, so everything will just continue to work. regards, Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/