Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1031205Ab2HIP70 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Aug 2012 11:59:26 -0400 Received: from mail-qa0-f53.google.com ([209.85.216.53]:41649 "EHLO mail-qa0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758556Ab2HIP7L (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Aug 2012 11:59:11 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [76.119.162.148] In-Reply-To: <1344526608.28967.1092.camel@edumazet-glaptop> References: <50215A7E.8000701@linaro.org> <1695034.0lrQgQPOMT@sifl> <1344523833.28967.996.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <5799181.tjlnF0gIh2@sifl> <1344526608.28967.1092.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 11:59:09 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv4: tcp: security_sk_alloc() needed for unicast_sock From: Paul Moore To: Eric Dumazet Cc: David Miller , Casey Schaufler , Eric Paris , John Stultz , "Serge E. Hallyn" , lkml , James Morris , selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, john.johansen@canonical.com, LSM , netdev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 728 Lines: 23 On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 11:07 -0400, Paul Moore wrote: > >> Is is possible to do the call to security_sk_alloc() in the ip_init() function >> or does the per-cpu nature of the socket make this a pain? >> > > Its a pain, if we want NUMA affinity. > > Here, each cpu should get memory from its closest node. Okay, makes sense. Acked-by: Paul Moore -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/