Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 08:38:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 08:38:38 -0400 Received: from mail2.alphalink.com.au ([202.161.124.58]:27993 "EHLO mail2.alphalink.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 08:38:38 -0400 Message-ID: <3D677F8D.F6B62040@alphalink.com.au> Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 22:43:57 +1000 From: Greg Banks Organization: Corpus Canem Pty Ltd. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.15-4mdkfb i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roman Zippel CC: Kai Germaschewski , Peter Samuelson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: [patch] config language dep_* enhancements References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1030 Lines: 27 Roman Zippel wrote: > > Let me mention (again), that we are talking about two different problems > here. On the hand bugs in the rulebase can be fixed with either syntax. Agreed. > On > the other hand major cleanups/extensions are better done with only a > single parser. >From a purely technical point of view it's easier to extend a single parser than N. A single parser is the Obviously Correct Approach (tm). But the problem is that changing to use a single parser is in itself a revolutionary step, doubly so if the syntax changes at the same time. Greg. -- the price of civilisation today is a courageous willingness to prevail, with force, if necessary, against whatever vicious and uncomprehending enemies try to strike it down. - Roger Sandall, The Age, 28Sep2001. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/