Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759622Ab2HIUUk (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Aug 2012 16:20:40 -0400 Received: from mail-qc0-f174.google.com ([209.85.216.174]:46021 "EHLO mail-qc0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755002Ab2HIUTE (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Aug 2012 16:19:04 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [76.119.162.148] In-Reply-To: References: <50215A7E.8000701@linaro.org> <1344462889.28967.328.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <5022FD9A.4020603@schaufler-ca.com> <1695034.0lrQgQPOMT@sifl> <1344523833.28967.996.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 16:19:03 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv4: tcp: security_sk_alloc() needed for unicast_sock From: Paul Moore To: Eric Paris Cc: Eric Dumazet , David Miller , Casey Schaufler , John Stultz , "Serge E. Hallyn" , lkml , James Morris , selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, john.johansen@canonical.com, LSM , netdev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 821 Lines: 21 On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Eric Paris wrote: > I'm going to work right now on exposing the equivalent struct sock LSM > interface so we can call that as well. But it's going to take me a > bit. Before you go too far down this path, can you elaborate on what exactly you mean by the above? I'm asking because I'm not convinced the labeling, either the old way or the new way, was 100% correct and I think we're going to need to change things regardless. I'm just not sure what the right solution is just yet. -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/