Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 09:56:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 09:56:50 -0400 Received: from dsl-213-023-021-235.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.21.235]:34729 "EHLO starship") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 09:56:49 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: conman@kolivas.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: VM changes added to performance patches for 2.4.19 Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 16:03:21 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] References: <1030170794.3d6728aa24046@kolivas.net> In-Reply-To: <1030170794.3d6728aa24046@kolivas.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 773 Lines: 21 On Saturday 24 August 2002 08:33, conman@kolivas.net wrote: > With the patch against 2.4.19: > > Scheduler O(1), Preemptible, Low Latency > > I have now added two extra alternative patches that include > either Rik's rmap (thanks Rik) or AA's vm changes (thanks to Nuno Monteiro for > merging this) > > For the record, with the (very) brief usage of these two patches I found the > rmap patch a little faster. This is very subjective and completely untested. Would you be so kind as to attempt to quantify that? -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/