Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 10:48:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 10:48:04 -0400 Received: from dsl-213-023-021-235.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.21.235]:4010 "EHLO starship") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 10:48:03 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: conman@kolivas.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: VM changes added to performance patches for 2.4.19 Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 16:54:35 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] References: <1030170794.3d6728aa24046@kolivas.net> <1030199809.3d679a012042b@kolivas.net> In-Reply-To: <1030199809.3d679a012042b@kolivas.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1165 Lines: 28 On Saturday 24 August 2002 16:36, conman@kolivas.net wrote: > Quoting Daniel Phillips : > > Would you be so kind as to attempt to quantify that? > > Ummm... I'm not sure if you're making fun or me? I haven't done any objective > tests so I can't quantify it ?? Not at all. We need to quantify such results as yours, if we can. > I just found the responsiveness of the machine a little better and don't have > the resources, time or inclination to test it with a benchmark. Fair enough. > It's my > understanding that the -aa patch performed better on benchmarks, but that some > people reported the responsiveness was better with -rmap anyway. I'd agree with > the latter statement. I offer both patches with mine so if people want to try my > patch and feel strongly either way they can choose. My aim is to optimise system > response for single cpu desktops, not multi cpu servers. -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/