Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 14:54:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 14:54:31 -0400 Received: from 205-158-62-105.outblaze.com ([205.158.62.105]:49068 "HELO ws4-4.us4.outblaze.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 14:54:30 -0400 Message-ID: <20020824185838.2961.qmail@linuxmail.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.41 (Entity 5.404) From: "Paolo Ciarrocchi" To: conman@kolivas.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 02:58:38 +0800 Subject: Re: Combined performance patches update for 2.4.19 X-Originating-Ip: 193.76.202.244 X-Originating-Server: ws4-4.us4.outblaze.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1967 Lines: 48 From: conman@kolivas.net Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 22:21:37 +1000 > > > > BTW, thank you for your great work!! > > > > > > My pleasure, but really the hard work is done by the developers! > > Sure, but your "performance" approach is really intersting! Do you use a > > benchmark? > > I don't really have the time to benchmark these things any more than "it feels > faster". Really I'm spending way too much time on this as it is and I'm not > remotely any authority on what benchmarks to use. Maybe I can find the time to run a few tests, can anyone suggest me an "intersting" test? > > > > I'm also testing the compressed cache (the > > > > patch you've discarded, and I got good performance!) > > > > > > I'm thinking of eventually merging the latest version of this into 2.4.19 > > too > > > since it can be enabled or disabled. Depends on the demand. > > Just an hint ('cause I made some of the test you can see on the compressed > > cache web page on sourceforge), > > if you use that patch boot your box with the > > compressed=XXM in order to set the amount of the compressed cache. My box > > runs fast and happy with 32MiB or 64MiB of compressed cache. My box has > > 256MiB of Ram. > > Ok thanks for the info. I believe the newer cc patch (not in my 2.4.18-ck4) is > better anyway. I'm afraid the cc will be later in the piece assuming I can kill > off the other bug I've created in the merge. I'd prefer to see a cc patch > specifically for 2.4.19 as forward porting it to .19 and then to O(1) (and so > on) are just too many steps. Fair enough. I think that soon we'll see the cc path for the 2.4.19, Rodrigo? Ciao, Paolo -- Get your free email from www.linuxmail.org Powered by Outblaze - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/