Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756114Ab2HJT3U (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:29:20 -0400 Received: from lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk ([81.2.110.251]:41049 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751563Ab2HJT3S (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:29:18 -0400 Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 20:33:55 +0100 From: Alan Cox To: Stas Sergeev Cc: Linux kernel , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Q: how to control the TTY output queue in real time? Message-ID: <20120810203355.224622cc@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <50255E31.8060904@list.ru> References: <50255E31.8060904@list.ru> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1536 Lines: 42 > I am writing an app that needs to control the > serial xmit in real-time. What I need is a notification > that the TTY output queue fillup (returned by TIOCOUTQ > ioctl) have dropped below the specified value. Not a supported feature basically. > I haven't found anything that can help implementing > this. If I can't get an async notification, the sync > notification will do too, like, for instance, the tcdrain() > call, but with the argument to specify the needed fillup, > below which the function will return. > If there is nothing like this, then even the notification > on every transmitted char will do. > But I've found nothing of the above. :( > > Any suggestions how the real-time control can be > implemented? Bascially even on the hardware that knows with this degree of granularity we don't propogate the information back in the manner you want. I'm not sure its a total loss however. Currently all the code basically does stuff in the tx path or tx irq handler along the line of if (bytes_left < constant) write_wakeup and I suspect if you made that adjustable and turned off the fifo and any other funnies you'd at least make it work for a sufficiently rigged demo. We could in theory put it in the tty_port in future too if its general purpose useful. Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/