Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754404Ab2HKSjh (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Aug 2012 14:39:37 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:60757 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751733Ab2HKSje (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Aug 2012 14:39:34 -0400 Message-ID: <5026A6D1.8070403@zytor.com> Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 11:39:13 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120717 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Takao Indoh , amwang@redhat.com, dyoung@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, rjw@sisk.pl, yinghai.lu@oracle.com, tiwai@suse.de, kexec@lists.infradead.org CC: Tejun Heo , Jacob Shin Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: revert "x86: Fix S4 regression" References: <1339478463-31172-1-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> <5004D8BF.6050205@jp.fujitsu.com> <500D20A1.1030800@redhat.com> <500D340F.5080801@jp.fujitsu.com> <1343145331.16290.45.camel@cr0> <500F3B7C.70009@jp.fujitsu.com> <20120811175759.GA1814@cantor.Home> <20120811182644.GA1787@cantor.Home> <5026A5AE.6050608@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: <5026A5AE.6050608@zytor.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1239 Lines: 37 On 08/11/2012 11:34 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 08/11/2012 11:26 AM, Jerry Snitselaar wrote: >>> >>> This patch from Jacob Shin solves the problem, and seems like it might >>> be a better solution. >>> >>> [PATCH 2/5] x86: find_early_table_space based on memory ranges that >>> are being mapped >>> >>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/9/540 >>> >> Actually, apply that series of 5 patches. >> > > I was hoping Tejun would comment on it, but I think I'll pull it into -tip. > > However, the real question is what we should do for -stable; applying > the full patch series seems a big aggressive for that. On the other > hand, if it really is The Right Thing then perhaps we should do so anyway. > Ah, right... still waiting for a rev of the patch to address Yinghai's legitimate request for minor code restructuring. Other than that, the patchset is really The Right Thing. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/