Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 10:26:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 10:26:05 -0500 Received: from minus.inr.ac.ru ([193.233.7.97]:48906 "HELO ms2.inr.ac.ru") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 10:25:52 -0500 From: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru Message-Id: <200012191454.RAA13529@ms2.inr.ac.ru> Subject: Re: ip_defrag / ip_conntrack issues (was Re: [PATCH] Fix netfilter To: davem@redhat.com (David S. Miller) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 17:54:35 +0300 (MSK) Cc: tleete@mountain.net, laforge@gnumonks.org, rusty@linuxcare.com.au, netfilter-devel@us5.samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200012191412.GAA06310@pizda.ninka.net> from "David S. Miller" at Dec 19, 0 06:12:39 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello! > able to lockup/OOPS his machine by logging into X as a user who had > his home directory over NFS. I believe this report is to be ignored. It is fully meaningless. X has nothing to do with NFS, NFS is with X, and defragmenter is at least with one of them. Alexey - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/