Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753554Ab2HMRbb (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Aug 2012 13:31:31 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:50772 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751379Ab2HMRb2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Aug 2012 13:31:28 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,761,1336374000"; d="scan'208";a="199902652" Message-ID: <502939EA.80907@intel.com> Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:31:22 -0700 From: John Fastabend User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Al Viro CC: netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Miller , Neil Horman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [flame^Wreview] net: netprio_cgroup: rework update socket logic References: <20120813015348.GZ23464@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <502896C5.7080303@intel.com> <50289D7F.3070402@intel.com> <20120813121827.GB23464@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <50293224.90803@intel.com> <20120813170109.GD23464@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20120813170109.GD23464@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1225 Lines: 29 On 8/13/2012 10:01 AM, Al Viro wrote: > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 09:58:12AM -0700, John Fastabend wrote: >> [...] >> >>> HOWEVER, it still doesn't address more fundamental problem - somebody >>> creating a socket and passing it to you in SCM_RIGHTS datagram will >>> leave you with a socket you can do IO on, still tagged according to who >>> had created it. >>> >>> AFAICS, the whole point of that exercise was to allow third-party changing >>> the priorities of traffic on sockets already created by a process we now >>> move to a different cgroup. Consider e.g. this: >> >> Correct that is the point of the exercise. >> >> To fix this specific case we could add a call to sock_update_netprioidx >> in scm_recv to set the sk_cgrp_prioidx value. > > On every received descriptor, that is? Eeek... > We are already iterating through the files in scm_detach_fds called from scm_recv(). This would be an extra (file->f_op == &socket_file_ops) check here and then the sock update. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/