Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752136Ab2HMRrJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Aug 2012 13:47:09 -0400 Received: from relay02ant.iops.be ([212.53.4.35]:54600 "EHLO relay02ant.iops.be" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751586Ab2HMRrH (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Aug 2012 13:47:07 -0400 Message-ID: <50293D96.9020202@acm.org> Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 17:47:02 +0000 From: Bart Van Assche User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chanho Min CC: James Bottomley , Mike Christie , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe , Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH][SCSI] remove the queue unlock in scsi_requset_fn References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5a1pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 535 Lines: 14 On 08/10/12 03:22, Chanho Min wrote: > We don't need to unlock the queue before put_device in scsi_request_fn() It looks like there is a typo in the patch subject ? Also, you can omit "[SCSI]" from the patch subject - AFAIK James has a script that inserts that text automatically. Bart. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/