Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 25 Aug 2002 09:38:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 25 Aug 2002 09:38:26 -0400 Received: from mailgate5.cinetic.de ([217.72.192.165]:58585 "EHLO mailgate5.cinetic.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Sun, 25 Aug 2002 09:38:25 -0400 Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 15:42:28 +0200 Message-Id: <200208251342.g7PDgSX20335@mailgate5.cinetic.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Organization: http://freemail.web.de/ From: To: joerg.beyer@email.de, "MattiAarnio" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "ZwaneMwaikambo" Subject: Re: Re: big IRQ latencies, was: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2437 Lines: 66 Matti Aarnio schrieb am 25.08.02 15:18:07: > On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 02:38:59PM +0200, joerg.beyer@email.de wrote: > > Zwane Mwaikambo schrieb am 25.08.02 14:10:12: > > > On Sun, 25 Aug 2002 joerg.beyer@email.de wrote: > > ... > > > That should fix your slowdown during untarring/disk access, as for your > > > NIC problem looks like you might be having a receive FIFO overflow, so > > > perhaps the card stops processing incoming packets? I have no clue, > > > > maybe this helps: outgoing transfer (from the laptop to some > > other machine) is reasonable fast: I could copy gig's of data > > away, but not to the machine. I asume sending away makes not > > so heavy use of IRQ's, right? > > A laptop, you say ? And network reception is jamming while yes a laptop. > there is high disk-write activity ? nope - no other disk activity except the scp I used to copy a file over the net. > /sbin/hdparam -v /dev/hda > > /dev/hda: > multcount = 16 (on) > I/O support = 1 (32-bit) <----- ?? > unmaskirq = 1 (on) <----- ?? > using_dma = 1 (on) <----- ?? > keepsettings = 1 (on) <----- ?? > nowerr = 0 (off) > readonly = 0 (off) > readahead = 8 (on) > I set the values as you suggested, but it made no difference: joerg@laptop> scp othermachione:1gig_file /tmp it take ~ 1/2 minute for 1 gig and gives a lot of errors on the nic: eth0 Protokoll:Ethernet Hardware Adresse 00:07:CA:00:AC:A3 inet Adresse:10.0.0.30 Bcast:10.255.255.255 Maske:255.0.0.0 UP BROADCAST NOTRAILERS RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:875 errors:6440 dropped:263 overruns:6440 frame:0 TX packets:897 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 Kollisionen:0 Sendewarteschlangenl?nge:100 RX bytes:1234333 (1.1 Mb) TX bytes:79498 (77.6 Kb) Interrupt:10 Basisadresse:0xf000 along with > 300 entries in /var/log/messages like this: kernel: eth0: Too much work at interrupt, IntrStatus=0x0040 could anybody explain to me, why there is "Too much work at interrupt"? and what I could do about it? Joerg - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/