Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755477Ab2HNJYG (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Aug 2012 05:24:06 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:51371 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752621Ab2HNJYF (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Aug 2012 05:24:05 -0400 Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:23:58 +0100 From: Mel Gorman To: Jim Schutt Cc: Linux-MM , Rik van Riel , Minchan Kim , LKML Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Improve hugepage allocation success rates under load V3 Message-ID: <20120814092358.GJ4177@suse.de> References: <1344520165-24419-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> <5023FE83.4090200@sandia.gov> <20120809204630.GJ12690@suse.de> <50243BE0.9060007@sandia.gov> <20120810110225.GO12690@suse.de> <502542C7.8050306@sandia.gov> <20120812202257.GA4177@suse.de> <50296522.2000809@sandia.gov> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50296522.2000809@sandia.gov> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1496 Lines: 47 On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 02:35:46PM -0600, Jim Schutt wrote: > Hi Mel, > > On 08/12/2012 02:22 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > > >I went through the patch again but only found the following which is a > >weak candidate. Still, can you retest with the following patch on top and > >CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING set please? > > > > I've gotten in several hours of testing on this patch with > no issues at all, and no output from CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING > (I'm assuming it would show up on a serial console). So, > it seems to me this patch has done the trick. > Super. > CPU utilization is staying under control, and write-out rate > is good. > Even better. > You can add my Tested-by: as you see fit. If you work > up any refinements and would like me to test, please > let me know. > I'll be adding your Tested-by and I'll keep you cc'd on the series. It'll look a little different because I'm expect to adjust it slightly to match Andrew's tree but there should be no major surprises and my expectation is that testing a -rc kernel after it gets merged is all that is necessary. I'm planning to backport this to -stable but it'll remain to be seen if I can convince the relevant maintainers that it should be merged. Thanks. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/