Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 08:59:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 08:59:54 -0400 Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.129]:43432 "EHLO e31.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 08:59:53 -0400 Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: (RFC): SKB Initialization To: jamal , davem@redhat.com Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, Robert Olsson , "Bill Hartner" , X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.7 March 21, 2001 Message-ID: From: "Mala Anand" Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 08:04:05 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D03NM123/03/M/IBM(Release 5.0.10 |March 22, 2002) at 08/26/2002 07:04:04 AM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1064 Lines: 32 >>I think the skbinit patch and recycling skbs are mutually exclusive. >I would say they are more orthogonal than mutually exclusive. >Although ou still need to prove that relocating the code actually helps in >real life. On paper it looks good. Troy Wilson (who works with me) posted SPECweb99 results using my skbinit patch to lkml on Friday: http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0208.2/1470.html I know you don't subscribe to lkml. Have you seen these results? On Numa machine it showed around 3% improvement using SPECweb99. Regards, Mala Mala Anand IBM Linux Technology Center - Kernel Performance E-mail:manand@us.ibm.com http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/linuxperf http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/projects/linuxperf Phone:838-8088; Tie-line:678-8088 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/