Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932338Ab2HOTxn (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Aug 2012 15:53:43 -0400 Received: from mail-qa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.216.46]:62651 "EHLO mail-qa0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932322Ab2HOTxd (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Aug 2012 15:53:33 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20120815190328.GA6714@quad.lixom.net> References: <1344966752-16102-1-git-send-email-catalin.marinas@arm.com> <1344966752-16102-3-git-send-email-catalin.marinas@arm.com> <20120814230645.GA19607@quad.lixom.net> <20120815173711.GC14264@arm.com> <20120815190328.GA6714@quad.lixom.net> From: Catalin Marinas Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 20:53:12 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: BA7IJLa38s_TG9ek0F_dIc61Oxw Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/31] arm64: Kernel booting and initialisation To: Olof Johansson Cc: "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Arnd Bergmann , Will Deacon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1422 Lines: 29 On 15 August 2012 20:03, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 06:37:11PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: >> If we add machine_desc structure back, we could print which machine was >> matched. But so far I try to keep the SoC code to a minimum and just do >> the probing later in the SoC code (of_find_matching_node). Ideally we >> shouldn't have any SoC code and just keep code in drivers but we'll see >> how far we can get. We can discuss more details at the KS as I would >> like the arm-soc team to get involved here. > > Interesting approach, I wonder if it'll scale, in particular if it comes > to needing to do early setup and init. For device-level setup, generic > will probably work just fine. And if it doesn't, things can be changed > later. So it sounds like a good start. > > Definitely something we should discuss. I suggest not doing it at KS > though, since only half of the arm-soc team is invited there. So the > ARM mini-summit or hallway around LPC is a better venue. I was indeed thinking of the ARM mini-summit or hallway discussions. The KS has different topics and it wouldn't have been of wide interest anyway. -- Catalin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/