Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754146Ab2HPF0b (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Aug 2012 01:26:31 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:34235 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751026Ab2HPF03 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Aug 2012 01:26:29 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,776,1336374000"; d="scan'208";a="187047574" Message-ID: <502C8479.1090704@intel.com> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 13:26:17 +0800 From: Alex Shi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111229 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Zijlstra CC: Rakib Mullick , Suresh Siddha , Arjan van de Ven , vincent.guittot@linaro.org, svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [discussion]sched: a rough proposal to enable power saving in scheduler References: <5028F12C.7080405@intel.com> <1345042516.31459.99.camel@twins> In-Reply-To: <1345042516.31459.99.camel@twins> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1146 Lines: 29 On 08/15/2012 10:55 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 20:24 +0600, Rakib Mullick wrote: >> How do you plan to test this power saving scheme? Using powertop? Or, >> is there any other tools? > > We should start out simple enough that we can validate it by looking at > task placement by hand, eg. 4 tasks on a dual socket quad-core, should > only keep one socket awake. > > We can also add an power aware evaluator to Linsched (another one of > those things that needs getting sorted). > > And yeah, someone running with a power meter is of course king. > > _BUT_ we shouldn't go off the wall with power meters as that very > quickly gets very specific to the system being measured. > > We should really keep this thing as simple as possible while still > providing some benefit for all various architectures without tons of per > arch knobs and knowhow. Definitely agree all! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/