Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 15:24:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 15:24:11 -0400 Received: from AMarseille-201-1-2-149.abo.wanadoo.fr ([193.253.217.149]:8048 "EHLO zion.wanadoo.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 15:24:10 -0400 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Alan Cox Cc: Daniel Egger , Alan Cox , Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.20-pre4-ac2 Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 22:37:20 +0200 Message-Id: <20020826203720.1562@192.168.4.1> In-Reply-To: <1030388788.2797.13.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> References: <1030388788.2797.13.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> X-Mailer: CTM PowerMail 3.1.2 carbon MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 780 Lines: 20 >If it was x86 I'd say "keep it for 2.4, delete it in 2.5, in the 2.4 one >add a printk advising people to switch driver". I don't know how the ppc >world is accustomed to handling this though Well, we aren't not really accustomed to obsoleting a driver yet ;) My original intend was just that (keep it in 2.4 and delete it in 2.5) but now, working sungem has been around 2.4 for quite some time and new machines aren't properly suported by it etc... The printk big bold warning on driver load may be the best option for 2.4 Ben. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/