Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932405Ab2HPOQA (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:16:00 -0400 Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f46.google.com ([209.85.215.46]:54420 "EHLO mail-lpp01m010-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752354Ab2HPOP5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:15:57 -0400 Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 18:15:53 +0400 From: Cyrill Gorcunov To: James Bottomley Cc: Al Viro , Pavel Emelianov , "J. Bruce Fields" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , Alexey Dobriyan , Andrew Morton , Matthew Helsley Subject: Re: [patch 4/8] fs, exportfs: Add export_encode_inode_fh helper Message-ID: <20120816141553.GF1209@moon> References: <20120815204546.GC25062@fieldses.org> <20120815210237.GF25421@moon> <20120815220622.GA28054@fieldses.org> <20120816062448.GA32081@moon> <20120816123814.GD1209@moon> <20120816134339.GQ23464@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <502CF9DA.8030701@parallels.com> <20120816135019.GS23464@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20120816135448.GP32081@moon> <1345125779.3259.50.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1345125779.3259.50.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1349 Lines: 25 On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 02:03:00PM +0000, James Bottomley wrote: > > > What's wrong with saying "we don't support idiotify"? > > > > Al, we need some way to restore inotifies after checkpoint. > > At the very early versions of these patches I simply added > > dentry to the inotify mark thus once inotify created we always > > have a dentry to refer on in encode_fh, but I'm not sure if > > this will be good design. > > Actually, I was about to suggest this. This can be done internally > within fs/notify without actually modifying the syscall interface, can't > it, since they take a path which is used to obtain the inode? It looks > like the whole of the inotify interface could be internally recast to > use dentries instead of inodes. Unless I've missed something obvious? Well, after looking into do_sys_name_to_handle->exportfs_encode_fh sequence more precisely it seems it will be easier to extend exportfs_encode_fh to support inodes directly instead of playing with notify code (again, if i'm not missing something too). i'm cooking a patch to show (once it's tested i'll send it out). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/