Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933260Ab2HPUmN (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Aug 2012 16:42:13 -0400 Received: from fieldses.org ([174.143.236.118]:43512 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932636Ab2HPUmL (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Aug 2012 16:42:11 -0400 Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 16:42:08 -0400 From: "J. Bruce Fields" To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: v3.5 nfsd4 regression; utime sometimes takes 40+ seconds to return Message-ID: <20120816204208.GE4385@fieldses.org> References: <20120815061115.GC32347@cucamonga.audible.transient.net> <20120815135854.GI32347@cucamonga.audible.transient.net> <20120815150251.GB16057@fieldses.org> <20120816201838.GA4282@cucamonga.audible.transient.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120816201838.GA4282@cucamonga.audible.transient.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3804 Lines: 85 On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 08:18:38PM +0000, Jamie Heilman wrote: > J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 01:58:54PM +0000, Jamie Heilman wrote: > > > Jamie Heilman wrote: > > > > I'll try to get full rcpdebug traces on client and server as the delay > > > > is occuring in the hopes that helps pin things down, and post them > > > > separately. > > > > > > OK, here are the logs from client and server, where a run of my test program > > > under strace -T resulted in: > > > > > > utime("utime-test.c", [2012/08/15-13:35:20, 2012/08/15-13:22:04]) = 0 <0.150815> > > > open("utime-test.c", O_RDONLY) = 3 <0.242635> > > > close(3) = 0 <0.147768> > > > stat("utime-test.c", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=696, ...}) = 0 <0.002772> > > > utime("utime-test.c", [2012/08/15-13:35:20, 2012/08/15-13:22:04]) = 0 <71.878058> > > > > > > The client is a 64-bit v3.4.8 kernel, the server is 32-bit, v3.5.1 + > > > the two sunprc patches that will be in v3.5.2. > > > > > > (The client's system clock is a touch faster than the server's, but > > > these logs start at the same instant.) > > > > Thanks for all the details. > > > > What's probably happening is that the client is returning a delegation > > with the open. The setattr then breaks that delegation; you can see it > > getting 10008 (NFS4ERR_DELAY) replies while the server waits for the > > delegation to be returned. But for some reason the callback to break > > the delegation isn't working. ("NFSD: warning: no callback path to > > client 192.168.2.42/192.168.2.4 tcp UNIX 0: error -110" (110 is > > ETIMEDOUT).) So instead you wait for the delegation to time out and get > > forcibly revoked. > > > > The reproducer might be more reliable if you did two opens. > > I made the change... not entirely sure it helped, but I think I've > bisected this reliably anyway. It came down to: Hm, weird. In the good case the cb_recall's done with auth_unix, in the bad case with auth_null. OK, that should be enough to go on.... Thanks for digging into this! --b. > > d5497fc693a446ce9100fcf4117c3f795ddfd0d2 is the first bad commit > commit d5497fc693a446ce9100fcf4117c3f795ddfd0d2 > Author: J. Bruce Fields > Date: Mon May 14 22:06:49 2012 -0400 > > nfsd4: move rq_flavor into svc_cred > > Move the rq_flavor into struct svc_cred, and use it in setclientid and > exchange_id comparisons as well. > > Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields > > :040000 040000 165568aae0fc47067863ea8ca911494033cbf2ce 54244f0084f58df4844b09d56e8e6bad0e19d913 M fs > :040000 040000 bae5a74a85bda2aa2b155b0bdca1ea0028502164 207751ce30c8f49c68fb0a85d0772cb0fa426ae1 M include > :040000 040000 ef940cf0c558fe65a21a710e6c95b2cefb2996fd 459ac143acf5cb2b3b7f59df29c417cedbb23c4b M net > > FWIW reverting this commit does seem to fix the problem. > > > It'd be worth looking at the traffic in wireshark. You should see > > setattr, open, close, setattr, a DELAY reply to the setattr, a > > CB_RECALL, and then a DELEGRETURN that gets a succesful reply. But for > > some reason the DELEGRETURN isn't getting through in your case, I'm not > > sure why. I can't reproduce that. You'll need to start wireshark > > before you mount to make sure it knows how to parse the callbacks. > > Captures from the server showing the delay (running 3.5.2) and the > previous behavior (running 3.4.9) are attached. > > -- > Jamie Heilman http://audible.transient.net/~jamie/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/